Sunday, February 26, 2006

ascertaining the tone of any e-mail message

50/50 chance of interpreting it correctly.

According to recent research published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, I've only a 50-50 chance of ascertaining the tone of any e-mail message. The study also shows that people think they've correctly interpreted the tone of e-mails they receive 90 percent of the time.

The researchers took 30 pairs of undergraduate students and gave each one a list of 20 statements about topics like campus food or the weather. Assuming either a serious or sarcastic tone, one member of each pair e-mailed the statements to his or her partner. The partners then guessed the intended tone and indicated how confident they were in their answers.

Those who sent the messages predicted that nearly 80 percent of the time their partners would correctly interpret the tone. In fact the recipients got it right just over 50 percent of the time.

"People often think the tone or emotion in their messages is obvious because they 'hear' the tone they intend in their head as they write," Epley explains.

At the same time, those reading messages unconsciously interpret them based on their current mood, stereotypes and expectations. Despite this, the research subjects thought they accurately interpreted the messages nine out of 10 times.

The reason for this is egocentrism, or the difficulty some people have detaching themselves from their own perspective, says Epley. In other words, people aren't that good at imagining how a message might be understood from another person's perspective.


-Assertaining the tone of an e-amil is without a doubt a tricky business. The reader has no visual cues and to make matters worse often times email composers write "like they speak" adding to the complexity. Nevertheless, even educational psychology professors believe they are so skilled that they can interpret email tone wtihout a problem. The researchers in this study call it "egocentricism." This researcher calls is "assholism."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home